Post by account_disabled on Jan 11, 2024 2:15:33 GMT -5
by the Chamber of Deputies on January 31, 2003, Maximiliano Nagl Garzez maintains that it is inadmissible, under any circumstances, for workers to be subjected to testing using a polygraph. Its use constitutes a gross violation of human freedom, dignity and privacy. Even in the case of vehement suspicions of a crime committed by the employee (e.g., theft or misappropriation), its use is a reprehensible practice (as well as bizarre), as the employer cannot institute it on his own, a disguised "criminal process", as the State is responsible for criminal prosecution. The practice of testing through.
polygraphs in work relationships – obviously unacceptable in our legal system, as it violates the dignity of the human person – is similar to the medieval methods of control described by Michel Foucault in his work Discipline and Punish. …Alexandre Agra Belmonte highlights the importance of the ILO Recommendations on the matter: "due to technological progress, which includes information techn Phone Number List ology, electronic video, listening and magazine devices, genetic, toxicological, graphological, psychotechnical, polygraphic and astrological examinations, intrusions into people's privacy have become much more accessible, Therefore, in an attempt to guide member countries in the development of.
standards aimed at curbing the illicit invasion of workers' privacy, in October 1996 the ILO approved a draft of practical recommendations on the protection of workers' personal data, with a view to future adoption of standards. international work on the matter." The attitude perpetrated by the appellant company also violates fundamental principles set out in article 5 of the current Magna Carta, and it is worth mentioning the sections below, correlated to the case in question: "Art. 5 Everyone is equal before the law, without distinction of any kind, guaranteeing Brazilians and foreigners residing in the country the inviolability of the right to life, freedom, equality, security and property, as per the following terms : "II – no one.
polygraphs in work relationships – obviously unacceptable in our legal system, as it violates the dignity of the human person – is similar to the medieval methods of control described by Michel Foucault in his work Discipline and Punish. …Alexandre Agra Belmonte highlights the importance of the ILO Recommendations on the matter: "due to technological progress, which includes information techn Phone Number List ology, electronic video, listening and magazine devices, genetic, toxicological, graphological, psychotechnical, polygraphic and astrological examinations, intrusions into people's privacy have become much more accessible, Therefore, in an attempt to guide member countries in the development of.
standards aimed at curbing the illicit invasion of workers' privacy, in October 1996 the ILO approved a draft of practical recommendations on the protection of workers' personal data, with a view to future adoption of standards. international work on the matter." The attitude perpetrated by the appellant company also violates fundamental principles set out in article 5 of the current Magna Carta, and it is worth mentioning the sections below, correlated to the case in question: "Art. 5 Everyone is equal before the law, without distinction of any kind, guaranteeing Brazilians and foreigners residing in the country the inviolability of the right to life, freedom, equality, security and property, as per the following terms : "II – no one.